A study about the interested parts of the public regional market programme (mpr) in the intermunicipal consortium for economic, social and environment development- cidema based on PMIR

Authors

  • Leani Lauermann Koch Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó - UNOCHAPECO
  • Rodrigo Barichello Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó - UNOCHAPECO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-1467
  • Claudio Alcides Jacoski Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó - UNOCHAPECO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2016.v2.144

Keywords:

projects management, interested parts, public regional market, management.

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the management of the Public Regional Market Programme (MPR), in Chapecó, administered by the Intermunicipal Consortium of Economic, Social and Environment Developments - CIDEMA from the perception of interested parts that take part in the program. Regarding the methodological procedures, the research is classified as descriptive. To collect the data, a structured questionnaire was made and applied to MPR manager and two Agriculture Secretaries to contribute in the analysis, there was a return of 85 % of the questionnaires. The program council and semistructured interviews were made with the MPR manager and with two responsibles for the program in the municipality. The results showed that the surveyed municipalities have their economic base rooted in family farming. MPR management is shared between CIDEMA and municipalities, however, they don't have unity in the process conduction, each municipality usually uses own methodologies to manage the program. The survey revealed gaps in the involvement of the interested parts throughout the program lifecycle, extending from the training of those responsible, the absence of environmental analysis considering the advantages and potential of each municipality, the lack of integrated logistics and the clarity in the attributions of those involved. It was also observed that the program benefits families in social aspects, improving the life quality. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Leani Lauermann Koch, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó - UNOCHAPECO

Mestranda de Ciências Contábeis e Administração - UNOCHAPECO

References

BRASIL. Tribunal de Contas da União. Manual de gestão de projetos. Brasília: TCU, 2006.

BRASIL. Secretaria de Estado de Planejamento e Gestão. Subsecretaria de Planejamento – SUBPL. Manual de Elaboração do Plano Plurianual 2012 – 2015. Rio de Janeiro, 2011.

CARVALHO, C. J. Elaboração e Gestão de Projetos. 2. ed. reimp. -Florianópolis: Departamento de Ciências da Administração/UFSC; [Brasília]: CAPES: UAB, 2012.

DEMO, P. Metodologia do conhecimento cientifico. São Paulo: Atlas. 2000.

FERRARI, A.T. Metodologia da pesquisa cientifica. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill do Brasil, 1982.

GIL, A.C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.

KEELLING, R.; BRANCO, R.H.F. Gestão de Projetos - uma abordagem global. São Paulo: Saraiva. 3ª Ed. 2014

KEELING, R. Gestão de projetos: uma abordagem global. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2002.

NORO, G. de B. A gestão de stakeholders em gestão de projetos. Revista de Gestão de Projetos. São Paulo. v.3,n.1.p 127-158. Jan./abr. 2012.

MAXIMIANO, A.C.A. Administração de projetos: como transformar ideias em resultados. 4. ed. – São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.

RICHARDSON, R. J. Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: atlas, 2012.

PMI - Project Management Institut. Guia do Conhecimento Em Gerenciamento de Projetos - Guia Pmbok® - 5ª Ed. 2014.

TRENTIM, M. H. Stakeholders como clientes nos projetos. Revista Mundo Project. Curitiba. Ano 8. nº 49, p,??. Fev/Mar. 2013.

SILVA, W. C.;ROCHA E MUCCI, C.B.M.;BAETA,O.V.; ARAÚJO, D.S. O Planejamento estratégico na administração pública: um estudo muLticaso. Revista de C. Humanas. Viçosa, v.13, nº.I,p. 90-101,jan/jun. 2013.

VALLE, A.B. do.; CIERCO, A.A.; SOARES, C.A.P.;FINOCCHINHO JUNIOR, J. Fundamentos do gerenciamento de projetos. 3. ed.- Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2014.

VARGAS, R.V. Gerenciamento de projetos: estabelecendo diferenciais competitivos. 7. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Brasport, 2009.

VERGARA, S.C. Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-30

How to Cite

Lauermann Koch, L., Barichello, R., & Jacoski, C. A. (2016). A study about the interested parts of the public regional market programme (mpr) in the intermunicipal consortium for economic, social and environment development- cidema based on PMIR. Revista Produção E Desenvolvimento, 2(2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2016.v2.144

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2016): MAY-AUGUST

Section

Territorial Affairs

License

All content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 Unported license. The articles are free to use, with their CC BY attributions of license.

The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s).

The publisher has the right to reject articles that in the evaluation process have been detected signs of plagiarism. The articles that have been detected indications of plagiarism after the publication, will be excluded from the edition. And the indication of the problem will be informed in the place of the text, keeping the same amount of pages.

This journal adopts the principles of ethical conduct of international quality Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), as well as the parameters of Integrity in the Scientific Activity indicated by SCOPUS and SCIELO. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)