Evaluation of the social and environmental quality of brazilian public squares
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2023.v9.633Keywords:
squares, socio-environmental quality, public open spaces, landscape, land use, assessment toolAbstract
Objective: the article reflects on socio-environmental aspects that qualify the squares in the Greater Center Region, Vila Velha-ES, from the application of the tool “QualificaURB” and presents considerations on the squares with the best and worst evaluation. Methodology: the research is defined in three stages: contextualization; mapping; application of the tool and analyses. The squares were classified as “regular” in most of the evaluation criteria. Results: among the 19 squares evaluated, none obtained the best classification "excellent" and of these, one obtained the worst performance, considered "insufficient". Originality: The analyzes showed weaknesses and strengths that interfere with the quality of these spaces, and help guide proposals for urban interventions.Downloads
References
Berke, Philip, Godschalk, David R., Kaiser, Edward J., Rodriguez, D. (2006). Urban land use planning. 5th edition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Buccheri Filho, A. T., & Nucci, J. C. (2006). Espaços livres, áreas verdes e cobertura vegetal no bairro Alto da XV, Curitiba/PR. Revista do departamento de Geografia, 18, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.7154/RDG.2006.0018.0005
Conde, K.; Alvarez, C.; Bragança, L. (2019) Proposta de critérios e indicadores de avaliação de sustentabilidade urbana para países latino-americanos. In: EuroELECS 2019. III Encontro Latinoamericano Y Europeo sobre Edificaciones y Comunidades Sostenibles. Argentina, Anais... Santa Fé, Argentina, Maio 22-25, p.1412-1424.
Degreas, H. N., & Ramos, P. G. (2015). Espaços livres públicos: formas urbanas para uma vida pública. Quapá, USP.
Beraldo, E. B., Tourinho, A. C. C., Barbosa, S. A., Castro, S. R., & Alberto, K. C. (2022). Public open spaces and quality of life: evidence from the WHOQOL-BREF protocol. Oculum Ensaios, 19, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0919v19e2022a5288.
Fayyaz, M., González-González, E., & Nogués, S. (2022). Autonomous Mobility: A Potential Opportunity to Reclaim Public Spaces for People. Sustainability, 14(3), 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031568
Gehl, Jan. (2014). Cidades para pessoas. 2. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
Hannes, E. (2016). Espaços abertos/espaços livres: um estudo de tipologias. Paisagem e ambiente, (37), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2359-5361.v0i37p121-144
Heemann, Jenifer; Santiago, P. Caiuby. (2015). Guia do espaço público para inspirar e transformar. Mountain View (CA), USA.
Holy-Hasted, W., & Burchell, B. (2022). Does public space have to be green to improve well-being? An analysis of public space across Greater London and its association to subjective well-being. Cities, 125, 103569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103569
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2010). Censo Demográfico 2010. Características da população e dos domicílios: resultados do universo. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2020). IBGE Cidades-População estimada. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Disponível em: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/es/vilavelha/panorama. Acesso em 03 abr. 2021.
ITDP Brasil. (2019). Índice de Caminhabilidade Ferramenta, Versão 2.0. Rio de Janeiro.
Jansen, F. M., Ettema, D. F., Kamphuis, C. B., Pierik, F. H., & Dijst, M. J. (2017). How do type and size of natural environments relate to physical activity behavior?. Health & place, 46, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.005
Jacobs, Jane. (2000). Morte e vida de grandes cidades. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Leite, M. A. F. P. (2011). Um sistema de espaços livres para São Paulo. Estudos Avançados, 25(71), 159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142011000100011
Macedo et al. (2018). Os Sistemas de Espaços Livres e a constituição da esfera pública contemporânea no Brasil. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Martins, B. F. G., & Santos, L. M. (2023). Playing in urban green spaces according to two generations. Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento, 9(1), e623. https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2023.v9.623
Mazzei, K., Colesanti, M. T. M., & Santos, D. G. (2007). Áreas verdes urbanas, espaços livres para o lazer. Sociedade & Natureza, 19(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.14393/SN-v19-2007-9350
Quagliarini, E., Bernardini, G., Romano, G., & D'Orazio, M. (2023). Users' vulnerability and exposure in Public Open Spaces (squares): A novel way for accounting them in multi-risk scenarios. Cities, 133, 104160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104160
Queiroga, E. F. (2011). Sistemas de espaços livres e esfera pública em metrópoles brasileiras. Resgate: Revista Interdisciplinar de Cultura, 19(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.20396/resgate.v19i21.8645703
Robba, F; Macedo, S.S. (2002). Praças Brasileiras: public squares in Brazil. São Paulo. Edusp: Impressa oficial do Estado.
Tedjari, A. F., & Abbaoui, M. (2023). Space Syntax for Evaluating Attractivity and Visit Frequency: A Comparative Study of Two Public Squares of Downtown Setif (Algeria). Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 13(1), 9899-9905. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5455
Vila Velha. (2018). Lei complementar nº 65, de 09 de novembro de 2018. Institui a revisão decenal da lei municipal nº 4575/2007 que trata do plano diretor municipal no âmbito do município de Vila Velha e dá outras providencias. Vila Velha: Câmara Municipal de Vila Velha.
Whyte, William. (2004) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. 3rd ed., New York: Project for Public Spaces.
Zhang, X.,B.A., Kang, J., & Meng, Q. (2018). Effect of soundscape dimensions on acoustic comfort in urban open public spaces. Applied acoustics, 133, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.11.024
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 Unported license. The articles are free to use, with their CC BY attributions of license.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s).
The publisher has the right to reject articles that in the evaluation process have been detected signs of plagiarism. The articles that have been detected indications of plagiarism after the publication, will be excluded from the edition. And the indication of the problem will be informed in the place of the text, keeping the same amount of pages.
This journal adopts the principles of ethical conduct of international quality Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), as well as the parameters of Integrity in the Scientific Activity indicated by SCOPUS and SCIELO.