Vertentes teóricas e metodológicas da gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2015.v1.102Palavras-chave:
resíduos sólidos urbanos, gestão ambiental, políticas públicas.Resumo
Este artigo possui três objetivos: i) realizar a revisão de literatura atualizada do setor de resíduos sólidos urbanos (RSU), i.é, reunir o material bibliográfico em termos de pesquisa científica recente; ii) identificar as principais orientações de estudos de fundo empírico e teórico, seguidas pela investigação moderna; iii) hierarquizá-las considerando escopo econômico, política pública, ambiental e gestão do sistema operador. Este trabalho foi realizado por meio da revisão de estudos do setor de resíduos de conteúdo publicado nas principais revistas internacionais. Os resultados parecem sugerir não haver um padrão único na abordagem destes estudos, mas, contém elementos-chave sob o guarda-chuva teórico “custo” e “eficiência”. A escassez de literatura sobre a estrutura produtiva do setor de reciclagem é central no debate atual sobre RSU para convergência de abordagens sobre custos contábeis e econômicos, custo de transação, logística, externalidades e falhas de mercado. Esta indagação é fundamental para lançar luzes na direção e no escopo das pesquisas sobre RSU em debates interdisciplinares tanto acadêmicos quanto políticosDownloads
Referências
ABRATE, G., ERBETTA, F., FRAQUELLI, G., VANNONI, D. The cost of disposal and recycling: an application to Italian municipal waste solid services. Hermes: Working paper n. 2, 2011.
ADAMS, T. (), Spotlight on the looming planning crisis. The Waste Manager, 1996.
ANTONIOLI, B., MASSARUTTO, A. The municipal Waste Management Sector in Europe: shifting boundaries between public service and the market. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, v.83, p.505–532, 2012.
AYRES, R., FERRER, G., VAN LEYNSEELE, T. Eco-efficiency, asset recovery and remanufacturing. European Management Journal, v.15, n.5, p. 557-574, 1997.
BAE, S. Public versus Private Delivery of Municipal Solid Waste Services: The Case of North Carolina. Contemporary economic policy, v.28: p.414–428, 2010.
BAILEY, I. Flexibility, harmonization and the single market in EU Environmental Policy: The packaging waste directive. Journal of Common Market Studies, v.37, p.549-571, 1999.
BARTON, J. R., DALLEY, D., PATEL, V. S. Life cycle assessment for waste management. Waste management. 16, p. 35-50, 1996.
BEL, G., MIRALLES. A. Factors Influencing the Privatization of Urban Solid Waste Collection in Spain. Urban Studies, 40, 1323–34, 2003.
BEL, G., FAGEDA, X. () “Empirical Analysis of Solid Management Waste Cost: Some Evidence from Galicia, Spain. Resouces, Conservation and Recycling. v.54, p. 187-193, 2010.
BERRENS, R., BOHARA, A., GAWANDE, K., WANG, P., Testing the inverted U-hypothesis for U.S. hazardous waste: an application of the generalised Gamma model. Economic Letters, v. 55, p.435-440, 1998.
BERTOSSI, P., KAULARD, P., LOLLI, A., MASSARUTTO, A. Per una nuova política industrial nel settore dell´igiene urbana in Italia. Economia Delle Fonti Di Energia e Dellámbiente, n. 3, 1996.
BERGLUND, C., SODERHOLM, P. An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization” Environmental and Resource Economics, v.26, n.3, p. 429–456, 2003.
BOHM, R. A., FOLZ, D.H., KINNAMAN, T.C., PODOLSKY, M.J. The Costs of Municipal Waste and Recycling Programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, p. 864-871, 2010.
BRINGEZU, S., SCHÜTZ, H., MOLL, S. Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy-Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7, p. 43-64. 2003.
BUCLET, N., GODARD, O. Municipal Waste Management in Europe: a Comparative Study in Building Regimes. Kluwer, Amsterdam, 2000.
CALLAN, S. J., THOMAS, J.M. Economies of Scale and scope: A Cost Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Services. Land Economics, v.77, n4, p. 548-560, 2001
CARROLL, W. The Organization and Efficiency of Residential Recycling Services. Eastern Economic Journal, v.21, p. 215-225, 1995.
CHEN, C. C., CHEN, Y. T. Income Effect or Policy Result: a Test of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Jounal of Cleaner Production, v.16, n.1, p. 59-65, ISSN 0959-6526, 2008.
COLE, M., RAYNER, A., BATES, J. The EKC: an empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, v.16, n.4, p. 401-416, 1997.
COLLINS, A., O’DOHERTY, R., SNELL, M. C. Household Participation in Waste Recycling: Some National Survey Evidence from Scotland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v.49, n.1, p. 121–140, 2006.
CRUZ, N. F., SIMÕES, P., MARQUES, R. C. Economic Cost Recovery In The Recycling of Packaging Waste: The Case of Portugal, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 37, p. 8-18, ISSN 0959-6526, 2012.
CRUZ, N.F., FERREIRA, S., CABRAL, M., SIMÕES, P., MARQUES, R. C. Packaging Waste Recycling In Europe: Is The Industry Paying For It?. Waste Management, v. 34, n.2, p. 298-308, ISSN 0956-053X, 2014.
DEMSETZ, H. Why Regulate Utilities?” Journal of Law and Economics, v.9, p.55-65, 1968.
DINDA, S. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics, v.49, p.431–455, 2004.
EEA. O Ambiente na Europa-Situação e Perspectivas 2010: Síntese. Agência Europeia do Ambiente, Copenhaga, 2010.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. EU focus on waste management. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. p. 18, ISBN 92-828-4825-6, 1999.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The European Climate Change Programme. Brussels: European Commission, 2006.
EZEBILO, E. E., ANIMASAUN, E. D. Households’ perceptions of private sector municipal solid waste management services: a binary choice analysis. International Journal of Environment Science and Technology, v.8, p.677–686, 2011.
FERRER, G., AYRES, R. U. The impact of remanufacturing in the economy. Ecological Economics, v.32, Issue 3, p. 413-429, ISSN 0921-8009, 2000.
FISCHER, C. Emissions pricing, spillovers, and public investment in environmentally friendly technologies. Energy Economics, v.30, n.2, p. 487-502, ISSN 0140-9883, 2008.
FISCHER-Kowalski M, AMANN, C. Beyond IPAT and Kuznets curves: globalization as a vital factor in analysing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population and Environment, 23, p.7-47, 2001.
FOLZ, D. Municipal recycling performance: a public sector environmental successes story. Public Administration Review. 59, p. 336-345, 1999.
GANDY, M. Recycling and the politics of urban waste. Earthscan Publications, London. 1994.
GARECHANA, G., RIO-BELVER, R., CILLERUELO, E., GAVILANES-TRAPOTE, G. Capturing waste recycling science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v.81, p. 250-258, ISSN 0040-1625, 2014.
GUNNINGHAM, N., GRABOSKY, P. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press / Oxford University Press, 1998.
HANSEN, W., CHRISTOPHER, M., VERBUECHELN, M. EU Waste Policy and Challenges for Regional and Local Authorities Ecologic–Centre for International and European. Environmental Research, Berlin, 2002.
HASS, D., MURPHY, F., LANCIONI, R. Managing reverse logistic channels with data envelopment analysis. Transportation Journal. v.42, n.3, p. 105-113, 2003.
HERVANI, A. A. Can oligopsony power be measured? The case of U.S. old newspapers market. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v.44, n.4, p. 343-380, 2005.
HIGHFILL, J., MCASEY, M. Municipal waste management: recycling and landfill space constraints. Journal of Urban Economics. v.41, n.1, p. 118-136, 1997.
JAFFE, A. B., NEWELL, R. G., STAVINS, R.N. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, v.54, Issues 2-3, p. 164-174, ISSN 0921-8009, 2005.
JENKINS, R., MARTINEZ, S., PALMER, K., PODOLSKY, M. The determinants of household recycling: A material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v.45, n.3, p.294-318, 2003.
KAIKA, D., ZERVAS, E. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory-Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energy Policy, v.62, p.1392-1402, ISSN 0301-4215, 2013.
LAVEE, D. Is municipal solid waste recucling ecomically efficient? Environmental Management, v.40, p.926-943, 2007.
LAVEE, D., KHATIB, M., Benchmarking in municipal solid waste recycling. Waste Management, v.30, n.11, p.2204-2208, 2010.
LEHMANN, P. Justifying a policy mix for pollution control: a review of economic literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, v.26, p.71-97, 2012.
LINO, F. A. M., ISMAIL, K. A. R. Energy and environmental potential of solid waste in Brazil. Energy Policy, v.39, n.6, p.3496-3502, 2011.
LEIGH, R. Economic growth as environmental policy? Reconsidering the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Public Policy, 24, p. 27-48, 2004.
MARQUES, R. C., CRUZ, N. F., Carvalho, P. Assessing and exploring (in)efficiency in Portuguese recycling systems using non-parametric methods. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v.67, p. 34-43, ISSN 0921-3449, 2012.
MASSARUTTO, A. Waste management as a public utility: options for competition in an environmentally-regulated industry. Utilities Policy, 15, p. 9-19, 2007.
MASSARUTTO, A., DE CARLI, A., GRAFFI, M. () “Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: A life-cycle costing approach. Waste Management, V. 31, Issues 9-10, p. 2102-2111, ISSN 0956-053X, 2011.
MASUI, T., MORITA, T., KYOGOKU, J. Analysis of recycling activities using multi-sectoral economic model with material flow. European Journal of Operational Research, V. 122, Issue 2, p. 405-415, ISSN 0377-2217, 2000.
MAZZANTI, M., ZOBOLI, R. Delinking and environmental Kuznets curves for waste indicators in Europe. Sciences Environmental, v. 2, n4, 2005.
MAZZANTI, M., ZOBOLI, R. Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness: evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. v.52, n.10, p. 1221-1234, 2008.
MAZZANTI, M., MONTINI, A., ZOBOLI, R. Municipal waste generation and socioeconomic drivers: Evidence from comparing Northern and Southern Italy. Journal of Environment and Development, 17 (1), p. 51-69, 2008a
METIN, E., EROZTURK, A., NEYIM, C. Solid waste management practices and review of recovery and recycling operations in Turkey. Waste Management, v.23, n.5, p. 425-532, 2003
NAKAMURA, S. An interindustry approach to analyzing economic and environmental effects of the recycling of waste. Ecological Economics, v.28, n.1, p. 133-145, ISSN 0921-8009, 1999
NESTOR, D. Partial static equilibrium model of newsprint recycling. Applied Economics, v.24, n.4, p. 411-417, 1992
OKUDA, I., THOMSON, V. E. Regionalization of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Japan: Balancing the Proximity Principle with Economic Efficiency. Environmental Management. 40, p. 12-19, 2007.
PEARCE, D. W. Does European Union waste policy pass a cost benefit test?. World Economics, 15, p. 115-137, 2004.
PERETZ, J. H., TONN, B. E., FOLZ, D. H. (2005), “Explaining the performance of mature municipal solid waste recycling programs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v.48, n.15, p. 627-650
PEROTTO, E., CANZIANI, R., MARCHESI, R., BUTELLI, P. Environmental performance, indicators and measurement uncertainty in EMS context: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (4), p. 517-530, 2008.
PIER, W.J., VERNON, R.B., WICKS, J.H. An empirical Comparison of Government and Private Production Efficiency. National Tax Journal, v.27, n.4, p. 653-656, 1974.
PLOURDE, C. G. A model of waste accumulation and disposal. Canadian Journal of Economics, v.5, n.1, p. 119-125, 1972.
READ, A. D., PHILLIPS, P., ROBINSON, G. Landfill as a future waste management option in England: the view of landfill operators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v.20, n.3, p. 183-205, ISSN 0921-3449, 1997.
SEPPÄLÄ, T., HAUKIOJA, T., KAIVO-OJA, J. The EKC hypothesis does not hold for direct material flows: environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis test for direct material flows in five industrial countries. Population and Environment, v.23, n.2, p. 217-238, 2001.
SHMELEV, S.E., POWELL, J.R. Ecological-economic modelling for strategic regional waste management systems. Ecological Economics. v.59, p. 115-130, ISSN 0921-8009, 2006.
SIMÕES, P., DE WITTE, K., MARQUES, R.C. Regulatory structures and operational environment in the Portuguese waste sector. Waste Management, v. 30, n.6, p. 1130-1137, ISSN 0956-053X, 2010.
SIMÕES, P., MARQUES, R. C. On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, v.106, p.40-47, 2012.
SMITH, V.L. Dynamics of waste accumulation: disposal versus recycling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v.86,n.4, p. 600-616, 1972.
STEVENS, B.J. Scale, market structure, and the cost of refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, v.60, n.3, p. 438-448, 1978.
SZYMANSKI, S., WILKINS, S. Cheap rubbish? Competitive tendering and contracting Out in Refuse Collection-1981-88. Fiscal Studies, v.14, n.3, p.109-130, 1993.
TICKNER, G., MCDAVID, J. Effects of scale and market structure on the costs of residential solid waste collection in Canadian cities. Public Finance Quarterly, v.14, p. 371-393, 1986.
VICKERS, J., YARROW, G. Economic Perspectives on Privatization. Journal of Economic Perspectives. v.5, n.2, 1991.
WALLS, M. How local governments structure contracts with private firms: economic theory and evidence on solid waste and recycling contracts. Public Works Management. v.9, p. 206-222, 2005.
WALLS, M., MACAULEY, M., ANDERSON, S. Private Markets, Contracts, and Government Provision: What Explains the Organization of Local Waste and Recycling Markets?. Urban Affairs Review, v.40, n.5, p.590-613, 2005.
WANG, P., BOHARA, A., BERRENS, R., GAWANDE, K., A risk based environmental Kuznets curve for US hazardous waste sites”. Applied Economics letters, v.5, n.12, pp. 761-763, 1998.
WENG, Y.C., FUJIWARA, T. Examining the effectiveness of municipal solid waste management systems: an integrated cost-benefit analysis perspective with a financial cost modeling in Taiwan. Waste management, v.31, pp. 1393-1406, 2011.
YANRONG, W., CUILI, W., HAN, W. Research on the Quantitative Relationship between the Generation of Industrial Solid Waste and Per Capita GDP of Henan Province. Energy Procedia, Vol. 5, pp. 593-597, ISSN 1876-6102, 2011.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Todo o conteúdo do periódico é licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons BY - Atribuição 4.0 Não Adaptada (CC BY 4.0). Autores e co-autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de publicação, sem retribuição financeira para os autores, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação.
Os artigos são livres de usar, com suas próprias atribuições de licença CC BY.
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es). Os artigos aqui publicados são de responsabilidade exclusiva do(s) autor(es), observando a Lei de Direito Autoral n 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Salientamos que cabe ao periódico apenas a responsabilidade da avaliação dos artigos, sendo um veículo de publicação científica.
O editor possui o direito de rejeitar os artigos que no processo de avaliação tenham sido detectados indícios de plágio. Os artigos que tenham sido detectados indícios de plágio posteriormente à publicação, serão excluídos da edição. E a indicação do problema será informada no lugar do texto, mantendo-se a mesma quantidade de paginas.
Esta Revista adota os princípios de conduta ética do Comitê de Ética na Publicação (COPE) da qualidade internacional, bem como os parâmetros de Integridade na Atividade Científica indicados pelo SCOPUS e SCIELO.
