Mitigação climática ou privação de conhecimento? Aprendendo com experiências de fundos socioambientais indígenas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2020.v6.435Palavras-chave:
amazônia brasileira, mitigação climática, direitos indígenas, fundos socioambientais, conhecimento tradicionalResumo
Objetivo: Refletir sobre os efeitos da exposição de povos indígenas a abordagens neoliberais para mitigação das mudanças climáticas, examinando os dois primeiros fundos socioambientais indígenas do Brasil, discutindo conflitos, colaborações e como esses mecanismos financeiros ajudam ou dificultam a simbiose entre o mecanismo de REDD + e práticas indígenas. Metodologia/Abordagem: Utilização de dados primários coletados entre 2011-15; observação; entrevistas abertas e semiestruturadas; grupos focais; codificação; e revisão da literatura. Conclusões: A análise realizada indica que as realidades das práticas neoliberais e capitalistas impõem exigências e demandas aos povos indígenas, restringindo sua capacidade de implementar adequadamente os objetivos dos fundos estudados e afetando suas práticas e formas de organização social tradicionais. Limitação da pesquisa: Os últimos dados de campo foram coletados em 2015, mas as lições destacadas continuam relevantes. Originalidade/Valor do artigo: Os conflitos e colaborações discutidos aumentam o debate sobre a neoliberalização da natureza e dão mais evidências para perceber que repensar as estratégias de mitigação do clima é oportuno e urgente, e o conhecimento indígena tem um papel significativo nesse processo.Downloads
Referências
[AIPP & IWGIA] Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact and International Work Group on Indigenous Affairs. (2011). ASEAN, climate change, REDD+ and indigenous people.
Amel, E., Manning, C., Scott, B., & Koger, S. (2017). Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science, 356(6335), 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1931
Anaya, S.J. (1994). The native Hawaiian people and international human rights law: Toward a remedy for past and continuing wrongs. Georgia Law Review, 28, 309. http://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/853
Angelsen, A., & McNeill, D. (2012). A evolução de REDD+ In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. Sunderlin & L. Verchot (eds.), Análise de REDD+: Desafios e escolhas. (pp. 31-48). Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Arhin, A. (2014). Safeguards and dangerguards: A framework for unpacking the black box of safeguards for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics, 45, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.003
Balée, W. (1989). The culture of Amazonian forests. In: D. Posey & W. Balée (eds.) Resource management in Amazonia: Indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7, 1–21.
Barcellos, L.M. (2016). Fundos ambientais: instrumentos de financiamento de políticas públicas ambientais municipais. IBAM.
Bayon, R., Deere, C., Norris, R., & Smith, S. (1999). Environmental funds: Lessons learned and future prospects. Global Environmental Fund.
BBC News Brazil. (21 November 2016). Tenho medo de morrer na própria aldeia: Como ‘cacique-modelo’ da Amazônia se tornou alvo de índios madeireiros. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-37980120
Brockhaus, M., & Angelsen, A. (2012). Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework. In: A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. Sunderlin & L. Verchot (eds.) Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Bumpus, A., & Liverman, D. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84(2), 127–155.
Cadena, de la, M. (2008). Alternative indigeneities: Conceptual proposals. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 3 (3), 341–349.
[CIMI] Conselho Indigenista Missionário. (2015). Lideranças Suruí afirmam ao presidente da Funai que não querem mais o projeto de carbono em suas terras. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://cimi.org.br/2015/02/36982/
Coburn, E. (2016). Alternatives: Theorizing colonialism and indigenous liberation: Contemporary indigenous scholarship from lands claimed by Canada. Studies in Political Economy. A Socialist Review, 97(3).
Comberti, C., Thornton, T., Wylliede Echeverria, V., & Petterson, T. (2015). Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Global Environmental Change, 34, 247–62.
Cristostomo, A., Alencar, A., Castro Silva, I., Mesquita, I., Fellows Dourado, M., Moutinho, P., de Araújo Lima Constantino, P., & Piontekowski, V. (2015). Indigenous lands in the Brazilian Amazon: From budgeting to climate change mitigation. IPAM Amazon Environmental Research Institute. Accessed 1 January 2019. http://ipam.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/indigenous_lands_in_the_brazilian_amazon-2.pdf
Da Silva, N., & Ferreira Neto, J. (2014). A monetarização da vida social dos Paiter Suruí. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 9(1), 163–181.
Dasgupta, A., & Beard, V. (2007). Community driven development, collective action and elite capture in Indonesia. Development & Change, 38(2), 229–49.
Deb, D. (2009). Beyond developmentality: Constructing inclusive freedom and sustainability. Earthscan.
Duchelle, A., & Jagger, P. (2014). Operationalizing REDD+: Safeguards challenges and opportunities. CIFOR REDD+ Safeguards Brief Intro. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). doi:10.17528/cifor/005183
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Fabiano, T., Ferreira, I., & Ferreira, I. (2011). Adapting to emerging institutions: REDD+ projects in the territories of the Suruí and Cinta-Larga Indigenous Peoples. Center for Sustainable Development, University of Brasília. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabiano_Toni/publication/267303017_Adapting_to_emerging_institutions_REDD_projects_in_the_territories_of_the_Surui_and_Cinta-Larga_Indigenous_Peoples/links/545f78a80cf295b56161c462.pdf
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 237–261.
Fatheuer, T. (2010). Dólares, esperanças e controvérsias – REDD na Amazônia. Henrich Boll Stiftung. Accessed 1 January 2019: https://br.boell.org/pt-br/2010/12/03/dolares-esperancas-e-controversias-redd-na-amazonia
Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. Autonomedia.
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002). Psychological foundations of incentives. Joseph Schumpeter Lecture. European Economic Review, 46, 687-724.
Ferronato, M., & Nunes, R. (2018). A exploração ilegal de madeiras na terra indígena sete de setembro, cacoal –ro. Porto Velho, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Rondônia. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268386169_A_EXPLORACAO_ILEGAL_DE_MADEIRAS_NA_TERRA_INDIGENA_SETE_DE_SETEMBRO_CACOAL_-_RO
Fleury, L., & Almeida, J. (2013). The construction of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant: Environmental conflict and the development dilemma. Ambiente & Sociedade n São Paulo, 16(4), 141–158.
Frey, B., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611.
[FUNAI] Fundação Nacional do Índio. (2012). Esclarecimentos da Funai sobre atuação do mercado voluntário de REDD em Terras Indígenas. Accessed 1 January 2019: http://www.funai.gov.br/ultimas/noticias/2012/03_mar/PDF/EsclarecimentosREDD.pdf
[FUNAI & MMA] Fundação Nacional do Índio & Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (2012). Premissas acordadas entre a fundação nacional do índio e o ministério do meio ambiente para a elaboração do componente indígena da estratégia nacional de REDD+. Accessed 1 January 2019. http://redd.mma.gov.br/images/publicacoes/premissas_funaimma.pdf
[Funbio] Fundo Brasileiro para Biodiversidade. (2013). Fundo Paiter Suruí: Manual operacional.
[Funbio] Fundo Brasiliero para Biodiversidade. (2012). Fundo Kayapó: Manual operacional. Accessed 1 March 2019: http://www.funbio.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Manual-Operacional-FUNDO-KAYAPO.pdf
Gebara, M.F. (2013). Importance of local participation in achieving equity in benefit-sharing mechanisms for REDD+: A case study from the Juma Sustainable Development Reserve. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2).
Gebara, M.F., Muccillo, L., May, P., Vitel, C., Loft, L., & Santos, A. (2014). Lessons from local environmental funds for REDD+ benefit sharing with indigenous people in Brazil. CIFOR Infobrief 98. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://www.cifor.org/library/5198/
Gebara, M.F., & Agrawal, A. (2017). Beyond rewards and punishments in the Brazilian Amazon: Practical implications of the REDD+ discourse. Forests, 8, 66.
Goodale, M. (2006). Reclaiming modernity: Indigenous cosmopolitanism and the coming of the second revolution in Bolivia. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 634–649.
Government of Brazil. (26 November 2015). Decree No. 8.576/2015. Accessed 1 January 2019. http://legislacao.planalto.gov.br/legisla/legislacao.nsf/Viw_Identificacao/DEC%208.576-2015?OpenDocument
Heringer, A. (2007). Os conhecimentos tradicionais associados e o acesso aos recursos genéticos: um estudo sobre a regulamentação da medida provisória n° 2.186-16/01. Revista Amazônia Legal de estudos sócio-jurídico-ambientais 1(2), 131–48.
Hiraldo, R., & Tanner, T. (2011). The global political economy of REDD+: Engaging social dimensions in the emerging green economy. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. 24.
Howell, S. (2014). No RIGHTS–No REDD: Some implications of a turn towards co-benefits. Forum for Development Studies 41(2), 253-272. doi:10.1080/08039410.2014.901241.
[IDESAM] Institution for the Conservation and Sustainable Development of Amazonas. (2011). Project description: Suruí Forest Carbon Project.
Independent. (13 April 2008). Amazon tribe enlists Google in battle with illegal loggers. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/amazon-tribe-enlists-google-in-battle-with-illegal-loggers-808492.html
Inoue, Cristina Yumie Aoki, & Moreira, Paula Franco. (2016). Many worlds, many nature(s), one planet: indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 59(2), e009. Epub February 06, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600209
[ISA] Instituto Socioambiental & Forest Trends. (2010). Avoided deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous Peoples: Experiences, challenges and opportunities in the Amazon context.
Jagger, P., Brockhaus, M., Duchelle, A., Gebara, M., Lawlor, K., Resosudarmo, I., & Sunderlin, W. (2014). Multi-level policy dialogues, processes, and actions: Challenges and opportunities for national REDD+ safeguards measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV). Forests, 5(9), 2136–2162.
Kowler, L.F., Tovar, J.G., Ravikumar, A., & Larson, A.M. (2014). The legitimacy of multilevel governance structures for benefit sharing: REDD+ and other low emissions options in Peru. CIFOR Infobrief 101. CIFOR. https://www.cifor.org/library/5201/
Lang, C. (2017). Xapuri Declaration: We reject any form of climate colonialism. REDD Monitor. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://redd-monitor.org/2017/06/20/xapuri-declaration-we-reject-any-form-of-climate-colonialism/
Lang, C. (2012). Indigenous Peoples Terra Livre Declaration at Rio+20 rejects REDD. REDD Monitor. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://redd-monitor.org/2012/06/22/indigenous-peoples-terra-livre-declaration-at-rio-20-rejects-redd/
Le Quesne, F. (2013). Indigenous experiments with payments for ecosystem services and the new frontiers of sustainability. Master thesis, Philosophy in Development Studies. University of Oxford.
Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: Narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 369–377.
Leis, H.R. (1999). A modernidade insustentável. As críticas do ambientalismo à sociedade contemporânea. Editora Vozes, Editora da UFSC.
Liverman, D. (2004). Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance and the commodification of nature. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 734–738.
Lohmann, L. (2012). Financialization, commodification and carbon: The contradictions of neoliberal climate policy. Socialist Register, 48, 85–107.
Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M.F., Kweka, D., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A., & Sunderlin, W.D. (2013). Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecology & Society, 18(4), 52.
Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation of ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26, 277–286.
McAfee, K., & Shapiro, E.N. (2010). Payment for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (3), 579–599.
McDermott, C.L., Coad, L., Helfgott, A., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: Actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science & Policy, 21, 63–72.
Meyer, C. (1997). Public–nonprofit partnerships and North–South green finance. Journal of Environment & Development 6(2), 123–46.
Mistry, J. (2009). Indigenous knowledges. In: R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 5, 371–376.
Mistry, J., & Berardi, A. (2016). Bridging Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Science, 352 (6291), 1274-1275.
[MMA] Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (2016). ENREDD: Estratégia nacional de REDD+. Accessed 1 January 2019. http://redd.mma.gov.br/images/publicacoes/enredd_documento_web.pdf
Moye, M. (2002). Innovative mechanisms to manage environmental expenditures in Africa, Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Draft background paper for discussion at session 3.2 of the OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Development: Conference on Financing the Environmental Dimension of Sustainable Development, 24–26 April. OECD.
Nichter, M. (2008). NGOs, social capital, and the politics of the possible. In: Global health: Why cultural perceptions, social representations, and biopolitics matter (133–49). University of Arizona Press.
O'Faircheallaigh, C., & Corbett, T. (2005). Indigenous participation in environmental management of mining projects: The role of negotiated agreements. Environmental Politics, 14(5), 629–647.
Oleas, R., & Barragan, L. (2003). Environmental funds as a mechanism for conservation and sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Accessed 1 January 2019. http://www.katoombagroup.org/documents/cds/redlac_2010/resources/8337.pdf
Onuf, N. (2013). Making sense, making worlds. Constructivism in social theory and international relations. Routledge.
Osborne, T., Bellante, L. & von Hedemann, N. (2014). Indigenous peoples and REDD+: A critical perspective. Indigenous Peopleʼs Biocultural Climate Change Assessment Initiative. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/38cf/f57cf41aff8700ec3d7b72dd2af39dbd4b11.pdf
Osborne, T., & Shapiro-Garza, E. (2018). Embedding carbon markets: Complicating commodification of ecosystem services in Mexico’s forests. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(1), 88–105.
Paiter Suruí. (2015). Lideranças Suruí denunciam exploração ilegal de madeira em Rondônia. Povo Indigena Paiter Suruí. Accessed 1 January 2019. http://www.paiter.org/liderancas-surui-denunciam-exploracao-ilegal-de-madeira-em-rondonia/
Pereira, S. (2013). Indians on the network: Notes about Brazilian indigenous cyberactivism. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1864–1877.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.
Rifkin, S.B. (2014). Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: A review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. Colorado School of Public Health.
Rival, L. (2012). Sustainable development through policy integration in Latin America: A comparative approach. UNRISD Occasional Paper Seven: Social dimensions of Green Economy and Sustainable Development.
Sampaio, M.S.B. (2006). A contribuição dos fundos públicos para o financiamento ambiental: O caso do FNMA. Master dissertation. Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília.
Savaresi, A. (2013). REDD+ and human rights: Addressing synergies between international regimes. Ecology and Society, 18 (3).
Schellnhuber, H.J., Kokott, J., Beese, F.O., Fraedrich, K., Klemmer, P., Kruse-Graumann, L., Neumann, C., Renn, O., Schulze, E.D., Tilzer, M., Velsinger, P., & Zimmermann, H. (2001). World in transition: Conservation and sustainable use of the biosphere. German Advisory Council on Global Change.
Sheng, J., Zhou, W., & de Sherbinin, A. (2018). Uncertainty in estimates, incentives, and emission reductions in REDD+ projects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1544.
Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Shankland, A. & Hasenclever, L. (2011). Regulation of REDD+ in Brazil: Beyond the war of the worlds? IDS Bulletin 42(3), 80–88.
Sullivan, S. (2017). On ‘natural capital’, ‘fairy tales’ and ideology. Development and Change, 48(2), 397–423.
Sullivan, S. (2014). The natural capital myth; Or will accounting save the world? Preliminary thoughts on nature, finance and values. LCSV Working Paper 3. The Leverhulme Centre for the Study of Value School of Environment, Education and Development. The University of Manchester.
Telles do Valle, R., & Yamada, E. (2010). A legal opinion on the ownership of carbon credits generated by forest activities on indigenous lands in Brazil. In: R. Telles do Valle (ed). Avoided deforestation (REDD) and indigenous peoples: Experiences, challenges and opportunities in the Amazon context. Instituto Socioambiental, Forest Trends.
The Guardian. (9 October 2018). Amazon at risk from Bolsonaro's grim attack on the environment. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/09/brazils-bolsonaro-would-unleash-a-war-on-the-environment
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations and Statute of International Court of Justice. Accessed 1 January 2019. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf
[UNFCCC] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2010). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session. 15 March 2011. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1.
Viatori, M. (2007). Zápara leaders and identity construction in Ecuador: The complexities of indigenous self-representation. Journal of Latin American & Caribbean Anthropology, 12(1), 104–133.
Wapner, P. (2010). Living through the end of nature: The future of American environmentalism. MIT Press.
Weller, M. (2009). Settling self-determination conflicts: Recent developments. European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 111–165.
Wilson, A.C. (2004). Reclaiming our humanity: Decolonization and the recovery of indigenous knowledge. In: D.A. Mihesuah & A.C. Wilson (eds.) Indigenizing the academy. Transforming scholarship and empowering communities. University of Nebraska Press.
Winer, M., Murphy, H., & Ludwick, H. (2012). Payment for ecosystem services markets on aboriginal land in Cape York Peninsula: Potential and constraints. Occasional Paper No. 6, Social Dimensions of Green Economy and Sustainable Development. UNRISD.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo do periódico é licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons BY - Atribuição 4.0 Não Adaptada (CC BY 4.0). Autores e co-autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de publicação, sem retribuição financeira para os autores, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação.
Os artigos são livres de usar, com suas próprias atribuições de licença CC BY.
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es). Os artigos aqui publicados são de responsabilidade exclusiva do(s) autor(es), observando a Lei de Direito Autoral n 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Salientamos que cabe ao periódico apenas a responsabilidade da avaliação dos artigos, sendo um veículo de publicação científica.
O editor possui o direito de rejeitar os artigos que no processo de avaliação tenham sido detectados indícios de plágio. Os artigos que tenham sido detectados indícios de plágio posteriormente à publicação, serão excluídos da edição. E a indicação do problema será informada no lugar do texto, mantendo-se a mesma quantidade de paginas.
Esta Revista adota os princípios de conduta ética do Comitê de Ética na Publicação (COPE) da qualidade internacional, bem como os parâmetros de Integridade na Atividade Científica indicados pelo SCOPUS e SCIELO.
