The disclosure of social responsibility: analysis of Portuguese websites city councils

Authors

  • Inna Paiva Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)
  • Francisca Lopes Monteiro Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 0649-026, Lisboa, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2025.v11.727

Keywords:

Divulgação, responsabilidade social, Website, Portugal, Câmaras Municipais

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyse the determinants of the disclosure of social responsibility information by Portuguese municipalities on their websites. Methodology: The websites of 302 Portuguese town halls were analysed. Data collection was based on five indicators for measuring and evaluating the information disclosed: the means of disclosure, accessibility, localisation, variety of content and quantity of content. The results were then cross-referenced with the municipalities' characteristic social and financial data. Results: The main results provide evidence that municipalities with a greater number of companies belonging to the manufacturing industry are more likely to publicise social responsibility information on their websites. Limitation/implications: This study investigates how the online the online disclosure of Social Responsibility by public organisations at a local level in Portugal and what factors influence it.  Originality/ value of paper:This study contributes to the existing literature by identifying that companies belonging to the manufacturing industry and the population influence the Social Responsibility information on the websites of Portuguese town halls. the websites of Portuguese town halls.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adelopo, I., Cea Moure, R., Vargas Preciado, L., & Obalola, M. (2012). Determinants of Web‐accessibility of Corporate Social Responsibility Communications. Journal of Global Responsibility, 3(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561211260539

Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2008). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0

Cho, C.H., Phillips, J.R., Hageman, A.M. & Patten, D.M. (2009). Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual web site disclosures, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(6), 933-952. https://doi.org/10.1108/0951357091098048

Chong, S., Ali, I. & Lodhia, S.K. (2016). A model for gauging the prominence of web-based CSR disclosure, Pacific Accounting Review, 28(4), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-02-2016-0016.

Chong, S. & Rahman, A. (2020). Web-based impression management? salient features for CSR disclosure prominence, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 99–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-08-2018-0221.

Cormier, D., Ledoux, M.-J., & Magnan, M. (2008). The use of web sites as a disclosure platform for corporate performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.04.002

Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

Gao, S., & Zhang, J. (2001). A Comparative Study of Stakeholder Engagement Approaches in Social Auditing. In Perspectives on corporate citizenship. essay, Greenleaf Pub.

Herzig, C., & Godemann, J. (2010). Internet‐supported sustainability reporting: Developments in Germany. Management Research Review, 33(11), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011085903

ISO 26000 - Social Responsibility. ISO. (2020, November 30). https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html

Joseph, C., Pilcher, R., & Taplin, R. (2014). Malaysian Local Government Internet Sustainability Reporting. Pacific Accounting Review, 26(1/2), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-07-2013-0071

Kaur, A. & Lodhia, S. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-12-2014-1901.

Lodhia, S. K. (2004). Corporate Environmental Reporting Media: A case for the world wide web. Electronic Green Journal, 1(20). https://doi.org/10.5070/g312010553

Lodhia, S. (2009). The World Wide Web and its potential for corporate environmental communication: A study into present practices in the Australian Minerals Industry. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 6(11), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v6_3.

Lodhia, S. (2014) “Factors influencing the use of the World Wide Web for Sustainability Communication: An australian mining perspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, pp. 142–154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.085.

Palma, M., Lourenço, I. C., & Branco, M. C. (2021). Web-based sustainability reporting by family companies: The role of the richest European families. Accounting Forum, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1979331

Pordata. (2021). População residente. https://www.pordata.pt/municipios/populacao+residente+total-359 (Accessed: February 20, 2023).

Portal autárquico. (2023). Portal Autárquico. Available at: http://www.portalautarquico.dgal.gov.pt/ (Accessed: February 20, 2023).

The global leader for impact reporting (no date) GRI - Home. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/ (Accessed: March 18, 2023).

Tsang, A., Wang, K. T., Wu, Y., & Lee, J. (2022). Nonfinancial Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Value: International Evidence on the Role of Financial Analysts. European Accounting Review, 33(2), 399–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2094435

Unerman, J. & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.009.

United Nations. (2022). Agenda 2021: Sustainable development knowledge platform. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

van der Laan Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Paiva, I., & Lopes Monteiro, F. (2025). The disclosure of social responsibility: analysis of Portuguese websites city councils. Revista Produção E Desenvolvimento, 11(1), e727. https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2025.v11.727