Hackathon as an instrument for innovation in collaborative networks: a bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2022.v8.602Keywords:
hackathon, bibliometric analysis, bibliometry, collaborative learningAbstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze hackathon contributions as an instrument for innovation in collaborative networks. Methodology: A bibliometry was performed in the Scopus and Web of Science bases through the Bibliometrix packages and the R Studio software. Publications analysis techniques were used describing the year and the group of origin (by Bradford Law), authorship analysis by the authors' relevance and their productivity (by Lotka Law), scientific contributions by country and collaboration between countries, Quotations of document with the cloud of word, as well as a thematic description of the hackathons universe. Results: An exponential increase in scientific hackathon publications from 2019 has been verified. Hackathon studies address and connect the theme mainly with innovation, collaboration, open data, education and covid-19. The increase of hackathon studies occurred during the pandemic period. Limitations: The study was delimited in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science), and in the English language. The expansion to other bases and languages can produce different results from the above, and represents a limitation of this study. Originality: The analyzes performed in this study made it possible to structuring the scientific literature on hackathon.Downloads
References
Balhoff, J., Holland, R., Vilella, A. J., Epigenetix, C., & Vision, T. (2007). The 2006 NESCent Phyloinformatics Hackathon: A Field Report. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 3, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430700300016
Bertello, A., Bogers, M. L., & De Bernardi, P. (2022). Open innovation in the face of the COVID‐19 grand challenge: insights from the Pan‐European hackathon ‘EUvsVirus’. R&D Management, 52(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12456
Braune, K., Rojas, P. D., Hofferbert, J., Sosa, A. V., Lebedev, A., Balzer, F., ... & Poncette, A. S. (2021). Interdisciplinary Online Hackathons as an Approach to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(2), e25283. https://doi.org/10.2196/25283
Briscoe, G. (2014). Inovação digital: o fenômeno hackathon.
Busby, B., Lesko, M., & Federer, L. (2016). Closing gaps between open software and public data in a hackathon setting: user-centered software prototyping. F1000Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8382.2
Cândido, R. B., Garcia, F. G., Campos, A. L. S., & Tambosi Filho, E. (2018). Lei de Lotka: um olhar sobre a produtividade dos autores na literatura brasileira de finanças. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 23(53), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23n53p1
Cardwell, F. S., Elliott, S. J., & Clarke, A. E. (2021). The value of hackathons in integrated knowledge translation (iKT) research: Waterlupus. Health research policy and systems, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00785-z
Cochrane, D. R. R., & Mello, J. A. V. B. (2020). Consequências da economia GIG na identidade profissional: revisão sistemática da literatura. Logeion: filosofia da informação, 6(2), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2020v6n2.p142-156
Connor, R., Brister, R., Buchmann, J. P., Deboutte, W., Edwards, R., Martí-Carreras, J., & Busby, B. (2019). NCBI’s virus discovery Hackathon: Engaging research communities to identify cloud infrastructure requirements. Genes, 10(9), 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090714
Criado, J. I., & Guevara-Gómez, A. (2021). Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times. A research of Spanish cases during the COVID-19 crisis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0242
Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
Dimonaco, N. J., Salavati, M., & Shih, B. B. (2021). Computational analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-like coronavirus diversity in human, bat and pangolin populations. Viruses, 13(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010049
Duarte, K.S., Lima, T. A.C., Alves, L. R., Rios, P. A.P., & Motta, W. H. (2021). The circular economy approach for reducing food waste: a systematic review. Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento, 7. https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2021.v7.572
Fadlelmola, F. M., Ghedira, K., Hamdi, Y., Hanachi, M., Radouani, F., Allali, I., & Mulder, N. (2021). H3ABioNet genomic medicine and microbiome data portals hackathon proceedings. Database, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baab016
Farias, J. S., & Jorcelino, T. M. (2021). Fatores intervenientes da transformação digital: um olhar sobre a promoção de Hackathons Acadêmicos na Embrapa. Revista Administração em Diálogo, 23(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2021v23i1.47944
Fattah, L., Gabrilove, J., & Bradley, F. (2021). Evaluating the impact of a health hackathon on collaborative team science: a Social Network Analysis (SNA). Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.46
Fecho, K., Ahalt, S. C., Arunachalam, S., Champion, J., Chute, C. G., Davis, S., & Peden, D. B. (2019). Biomedical Data Translator Consortium Sex, obesity, diabetes, and exposure to particulate matter among patients with severe asthma: Scientific insights from a comparative analysis of open clinical data sources during a five-day hackathon. J Biomed Inform, 30244-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103325
Germano, A. X.S., Mello, J. A. V. B., & Motta, W. H. (2021). Contribution of industry 4.0 technologies to sustainability: a systematic review/Contribuicao das tecnologias da indústria 4.0 para a sustentabilidade: uma revisao sistematica. Palabra clave, 11(1), NA-NA. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e142
Granados, C., & Pareja-Eastaway, M. (2019). How do collaborative practices contribute to innovation in large organisations? The case of hackathons. Innovation, 21(4), 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1585190
Hepp, A., & Schmitz, A. (2022). The limits of the maker ideology: local makerspaces, experimental practices, and COVID-19. Continuum, 36(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2021.2003755
Imam, A., & Dey, T. (2021). Tracking Hackathon Code Creation and Reuse. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) (pp. 615-617). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR52588.2021.00085
Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 799-824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915578486
Johnson, P., & Robinson, P. (2014). Civic hackathons: Innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of policy research, 31(4), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12074
Kazemitabar, M., Lajoie, S. P., & Doleck, T. (2022). A process model of team emotion regulation: An expansion of Gross' individual ER model. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 33, 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100612
Li, C., Xiong, Y., Sit, H. F., Tang, W., Hall, B. J., Muessig, K. E., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). A Men Who Have Sex With Men–Friendly Doctor Finder Hackathon in Guangzhou, China: Development of a Mobile Health Intervention to Enhance Health Care Utilization. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(2), e16030. https://doi.org/10.2196/16030
Li, L. M., & Johnson, S. (2015). Hackathon as a way to raise awareness and foster innovation for stroke. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 73, 1002-1004. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20150177
Lousada, M., Garcia, C. L. S., Woida, L. M., Dal’Evedove, P., Garcia, R., & Valentim, M. L. P. (2012, October). Produção científica sobre gestão do conhecimento e gestão da informação no âmbito da ciência da informação: uma aplicação da Lei de Bradford. In Anales de documentación (Vol. 15, No. 2). Facultad de Comunicación y Documentación y Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.15.2.138741
Lyndon, M. P., Cassidy, M. P., Celi, L. A., Hendrik, L., Kim, Y. J., Gomez, N., & Dagan, A. (2018). Hacking hackathons: preparing the next generation for the multidisciplinary world of healthcare technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 112, 1-5.
Nagendrababu, V., Jacimovic, J., Jakovljevic, A., Rossi‐Fedele, G., & Dummer, P. M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most‐cited case reports and case series in Endodontic journals. International Endodontic Journal, 55(3), 185-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13668
Ramatowski, J. W., Lee, C. X., Mantzavino, A., Ribas, J., Guerra, W., Preston, N. D., ... & Lassmann, B. (2017). Planning an innovation marathon at an infectious disease conference with results from the International Meeting on Emerging Diseases and Surveillance 2016 Hackathon. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 65, 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2017.09.025
Serek, A., Zhaparov, M., Yoo, S. M., Talasbek, A., Kim, Y. K., & Jin, M. W. (2020). Best Practices in Running IT Hackathons Based on Paragon University Dataset. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(19), 231-238. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.15523
Suominen, A. Helena, Halvari, S., & Jussila, J. 2019. World Heritage meets Smart City in an Urban-Educational Hackathon in Rauma. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(9), 45-54. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1268
Taylor, N., & Clarke, L. (2018, April). Everybody’s hacking: participation and the mainstreaming of hackathons. In CHI 2018 (pp. 1-2). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173746
Temiz, S. (2021). Open innovation via crowdsourcing: a digital only hackathon case study from Sweden. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010039
Verschoore, J. R. (2020). A coordenação de esforços coletivos para enfrentar a pandemia do novo coronavírus: um estudo de caso sobre o hackathon Hack for Brazil| Covid-19. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre), 26, 238-264. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.283.103388
Vivanco-Galvan, O. A., Castillo-Malla, D., & Jimenez-Gaona, Y. (2018). Multidisciplinary HACKATHON: strengthening project-based learning. Revista Electronica Calidad en la Educacion Superior, 9(1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.22458/caes.v9i1.1893
Winne, J., Filipan, K., Moens, B., Devos, P., Leman, M., Botteldooren, D., & De Coensel, B. (2020). The soundscape hackathon as a methodology to accelerate co-creation of the urban public space. Applied Sciences, 10(6), 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10061932
Xin, R., Li, Y., & Yu, H. (2018, March). Zipf’s Law and the Frequency of Kazak Phonemes in Word Formation. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 317, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/317/1/012057
Yasuda, T., Imai, K., Shigihara, Y., Arikawa, T., Baba, T., Chikasada, N., & Tominaga, Y. (2021). Numerical Simulation of Urban Inundation Processes and Their Hydraulic Quantities–Tsunami Analysis Hackathon Theme 1–. Journal of Disaster Research, 16(7), 978-993. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2021.p0978
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 Unported license. The articles are free to use, with their CC BY attributions of license.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s).
The publisher has the right to reject articles that in the evaluation process have been detected signs of plagiarism. The articles that have been detected indications of plagiarism after the publication, will be excluded from the edition. And the indication of the problem will be informed in the place of the text, keeping the same amount of pages.
This journal adopts the principles of ethical conduct of international quality Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), as well as the parameters of Integrity in the Scientific Activity indicated by SCOPUS and SCIELO.