Educational Evaluation of the Federal University of Latin American Integration, Brazil
AbstractPurpose: Analyzes satisfaction with the Federal University of Integration of Latin America (UNILA). Focused on the development of a new educational scheme in Latin America, being a university more open to change, multicultural, bilingual and Latin American. Methodology: the institutional evaluation quantitative methodology would be applied by the multidimensional method, being able to contemplate all the specificities of the academic community. Findings: This study answers four hypotheses that are within the four large educational dimensions evaluated. The results show that there are around 62% of satisfaction throughout the university, but they also indicate a concern for international, social and educational cooperation. Research Limitation: The main limitation of the investigation is related to the period of time considered (one year). Therefore, it is recommended to verify the results obtained in this study, carrying out a longitudinal investigation (considering more years). Originality: We generated a model that is oriented towards a generic measurement of satisfaction and it was builted considering the four distinguishing dimensions required by Educational Minister. All results were analyzed in a linear regression econometric model that were show us the level of significance of each question. KEYWORD: Multicultural education, evaluation technique, multidimensional analysis, regression econometric model, Reliability and validity.
Aitken, N. (1982). College student performance, satisfaction, and retention: Specification and estimation of a structural model. Journal of Higher Education, 53(1), 32–50.
Amaral, E., Gonçalves, E., Potter, J. (2012). Long Term Influences of Age–Education Transition on the Brazilian Labour Market. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 31(3), 302–319.
Bini, M., Masserini, L. (2016). Students´ satisfations and teaching efficiency of university offer. Social Indicators Research, 129, 847-862.
Browne, B., Kaldenberg, D., Browne, W., Brown, D. (1998). Student as customers: Factors affecting satisfaction and assessments of institutional quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8(3), 1-14.
Remolina-Caviedes J.F. (2020). Evaluación educativa y codeterminaciones de la producción escolar Ensaio: avaliação política pública Educação, 28(106), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362019002701629
Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Contingencies in case studies and concepts. Berkshire: England.
Cpa Comissão Própria de Avaliação. (2016). Relatório parcial de auto avaliação institucional II. CICLO 2016. UNILA. https://unila.edu.br/sites/default/files/files/II_Relat%C3% B3rio_de_Autoavaliacao_CPA%20-%20CICLO%202016(1).pdf
Crawford, F. (1991). Total quality management. London: Committee of vice-chancellors and principals occasional paper of the universities of the United Kingdom.
De La Orden, A. (1988). La calidad de la educación. Bordón, 40(2), 149-161.
Diaz-Villavicencio, G., Didonet, S., Dodd, A. (2016). Perspectives on Innovation Management of Ecuadorian Companies, International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(6), 1650048 (20 pages) © World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd. DOI: 10.1142/S1363919616500481
Douglas, J., Douglas, A., Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 251–267.
Flores Balboza, J. (2005). Encuesta sobre la Satisfacción Estudiantil. Edit Lima.
Gento, S., Vivas, M. (2003). El SEUE: un instrumento para conocer la satisfacción de los estudiantes universitarios con su educación. Acción Pedagógica, 12(2), 16-27.
González S.S., Martin S.C., Gonzales M.C. (2019). Ensaio: aval. pol. públ. Educ., Rio de Janeiro, 27(105), 817-838. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362019002701625
Hatcher, L., Kryter, K., Prus, J. S., Fitzgerald, V. (1992). Predicting college student satisfaction, commitment, and attrition from investment model constructs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(16), 1273–1296.
Hussein, N., Bahmani, S. (2012). Development of the student university satisfaction scale: Reliability and validity. Interdisciplinary Journal of contemporary research business, 4(3), 332–341.
Jiménez, A., Terriquez, B., Robles, F. (2011). Evaluación de la satisfacción académica de los estudiantes de la Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit. Revista Fuente, 3(6). ISSN 2007-0713.
Jones, S. (2009). Dynamics social norms and the unexpected transformation of women’s higher education. Social Sciences History, 33(3), 247–291.
Love, B. J. (1993). Issues and problems in the retention of Black students in predominately White institutions of higher learning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 26(1), 27–37.
Mendonca, J., Fernandes, D., Helal, D., Cassunde, F. (2020). Políticas Públicas para la Educación Superior a Distancia: un examen del papel de la Universidad Abierta de Brasil. Ensaio: aval.pol.públ.Educ. [online], 28(106), 156-177. Epub 02-Dez-2019. ISSN 0104-4036.
Misanew, A., Tadesse, M. (2014). Determinants of student and staff satisfaction with services at Dilla University, Ethiopia: Application of single and multilevel logistic regression analyses. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1571–1587.
Novales, A. (1993). Econometría. 2nd Edition. Interamericana de España, Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Paz, O. (1976). O Labirinto da Solidão e Post-scriptum. trad. port., Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Pérez Zamora, L.A., López López, M.C., Couto Olivares, J.M., Navarro Luque, G. (2012). Does student satisfaction depend on the actual quality of the faculty or on the perception of the student? comparative analysis between public and private faculties. ReiDoCrea. Revista electrónica de investigación Docencia Creativa. 1, 29-37.
Ping, C. (1993). Accountability in higher education. The Ohio CPA Journal, 52(2), 11–18.
Sanchis, C., Santana, R., Mora, M. (2017). Satisfacción de los estudiantes universitarios en los procesos de e- evaluación del aprendizaje. Actas xviii congreso internacional de investigación educativa interdisciplinariedad y transferencia aidipe
Sander, B. (2007). Administração da Educação no Brasil: Genealogia do Conhecimento. Brasília: Liber Livro.
Stables, K., Kimbell, R. (2001). Technology education in south Africa: evaluating an innovative pilot project. Research in Science Education, 31, 71-90.
Wallace, J. (1999). The case for students as customers. Quality Progress, 32(2), 47-51.
Zas, B. (2002). La satisfacción como indicador de excelencia en la calidad de los servicios de salud. Revista Electrónica Psicología Científica.
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 Unported license. The articles are free to use, with their CC BY attributions of license.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s).
The publisher has the right to reject articles that in the evaluation process have been detected signs of plagiarism. The articles that have been detected indications of plagiarism after the publication, will be excluded from the edition. And the indication of the problem will be informed in the place of the text, keeping the same amount of pages.
This journal adopts the principles of ethical conduct of international quality Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), as well as the parameters of Integrity in the Scientific Activity indicated by the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). These Guidelines are available at the following address: http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizes