CROSS-FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES IN THE ERA OF INDUSTRY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32358/rpd.2019.v5.350Keywords:
cross-functional integration, product development, industry 4.0Abstract
Industry 4.0 covers the use of technologies such as: internet of things, cloud computing, machine-to-machine integration, communication, 3D printing and big data. In this context, cross-functional integration is essential for the product development. The objective of this paper is to characterize the literature on cross-functional integration in product development processes in the context of the technologies of Industry 4.0. A systematic literature review was carried out to analyze the literature on this topic. There is a growing trend of publications mentioning cross-functional integration in product development, in the studied context. The mainstream of cross-functional integration research focuses on cooperation between people, in the sense of integrating structures of function and power. However, in the context of Industry 4.0, there is a shift in this emphasis on people. People continue to be oriented to cooperate with each other to obtain joint results at the firm level. However, this cooperation is more related to the development of skills to deal with cyber-physical processes and with the knowledge produced by machines and information systems. This kind of interaction ability between human, machine and system, can generate a new way to study cross-functional integration.Downloads
References
BERTAN, F. O., FERREIRA, A. C., PIMENTA, M. L., HILLETOFTH, P. Análise da Integração Interfuncional nos Pontos de Contato de Processos de Desenvolvimento de Sementes. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, v. 18, n. 3, 2016.
BRETTEL, M., FRIEDERICHSEN, N., KELLER, M., ROSENBERG, M. How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective. International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial Science and Engineering, v. 8, n. 1, p. 37-44, 2014.
CALANTONE, R.; DRÖGE, C.; VICKERY, S. Investigating the manufacturing–marketing interface in new product development: does context affect the strength of relationships?. Journal of Operations Management, v. 20, n. 3, p. 273-287, 2002.
CANDI, M.; BELTAGUI, A. Effective use of 3D printing in the innovation process. Technovation, 2018.
CHEN, B., WAN, J., SHU, L., Li, P., MUKHERJEE, M., YIN, B. Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges. IEEE Access, v. 6, p. 6505-6519, 2018.
CHERNATONY, L.; COTTAM, S.. Interacting contributions of different departments to brand success. Journal of Business Research, v. 62, n. 3, p. 297-304, 2009.
CLARK, K.B.; FUJIMOTO, T. Product development performance. 1991.
COOPER, R.G.; KLEINSCHMIDT, E.J. An investigation into the new product process: steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 3, n. 2, p. 71-85, 1986.
ELLINGER, A.E.; DAUGHERTY, P.J.; KELLER, S.B. The relationship between marketing/logistics interdepartmental integration and performance in US manufacturing firms: an empirical study. Journal of Business Logistics, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1, 2000.
HEHENBERGER, P., VOGEL-HEUSER, B., BRADLEY, D., EYNARD, B., TOMIYAMA, T., ACHICHE, S. Design, modelling, simulation and integration of cyber physical systems: Methods and applications. Computers in Industry, v. 82, p. 273-289, 2016.
JABBOUR, A. B. S. L., JABBOUR, C. J. C., FOROPON, C., GODINHO FILHO, M.. When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 132, p. 18-25, 2018.
JUGEND, D., SILVA, S. L., MAGNANINI ALMEIDA, L. F., GOBBO JUNIOR, J. A. Integration practices for the technological innovation of products: Case studies at two large technological companies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 8, p. 58- 58, 2013.
KAHN, K.B. Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 13, n. 2, p. 137-151, 1996.
LAWRENCE, P.R.; JAY, W. L. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1967.
LI, D. Perspective for smart factory in petrochemical industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, v. 91, p. 136-148, 2016.
LIU, X. F., SHAHRIAR, M. R., AL SUNNY, S. N., LEU, M. C., HU, L. Cyber-physical manufacturing cloud: Architecture, virtualization, communication, and testbed. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, v. 43, p. 352-364, 2017.
MAUERHOEFER, T.; STRESE, S.; BRETTEL, M. The impact of information technology on new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 34, n. 6, p. 719-738, 2017.
MOEUF, A., PELLERIN, R., LAMOURI, S., TAMAYO-GIRALDO, S., BARBARAY, R. The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, v. 56, n. 3, p. 1118-1136, 2018.
MOLLENKOPF, D.; GIBSON, A.; OZANNE, L. The integration of marketing and logistics functions: an empirical examination of New Zealand firms. Journal of Business Logistics, v. 21, n. 2, p. 89, 2000.
MÜLLER, J.M.; BULIGA, O.; VOIGT, K.. Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 132, p. 2-17, 2018.
MURPHY, P.R.; POIST, R.F. Comparative views of logistics and marketing practitioners regarding interfunctional co-ordination. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, v. 26, n. 8, p. 15-28, 1996.
NEIROTTI, P.; RAGUSEO, E.; PAOLUCCI, E. How SMEs develop ICT-based capabilities in response to their environment: Past evidence and implications for the uptake of the new ICT paradigm. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, v. 31, n. 1, p. 10-37, 2018.
OESTERREICH, T. D.; TEUTEBERG, F. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, v. 83, p. 121-139, 2016.
PAPAZOGLOU, M.; VAN DEN HEUVEL, W.; MASCOLO, J. Reference architecture and knowledge-based structures for smart manufacturing networks. IEEE Software, 2015.
PENAS, O., PLATEAUX, R., PATALANO, S., HAMMADI, M. Multi-scale approach from mechatronic to Cyber-Physical Systems for the design of manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, v. 86, p. 52-69, 2017.
PIMENTA, M.L.; SILVA, A.L.; TATE, W.L. Characteristics of cross-functional integration processes: Evidence from Brazilian organizations. The International Journal of Logistics Management, v. 27, n. 2, p. 570-594, 2016.
RASHID, A., MASOOD, T., ERKOYUNCU, J. A., TJAHJONO, B., KHAN, N., SHAMI, M. U. D. Enterprise systems’ life cycle in pursuit of resilient smart factory for emerging aircraft industry: a synthesis of Critical Success Factors’(CSFs), theory, knowledge gaps, and implications. Enterprise Information Systems, v. 12, n. 2, p. 96-136, 2018.
ROY, R., STARK, R., TRACHT, K., TAKATA, S., MORI, M. Continuous maintenance and the future–Foundations and technological challenges. CIRP Annals, v. 65, n. 2, p. 667-688, 2016.
RYMASZEWSKA, Anna; HELO, Petri; GUNASEKARAN, Angappa. IoT powered servitization of manufacturing–an exploratory case study. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 192, p. 92-105, 2017.
STANK, T.P.; DAUGHERTY, P.J.; ELLINGER, A.E. Marketing/logistics integration and firm performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, v. 10, n. 1, p. 11-24, 1999.
TORTORELLA, G.L.; FETTERMANN, D. Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, v. 56, n. 8, p. 2975-2987, 2018.
VYATKIN, V., SALCIC, Z., ROOP, P. S., FITZGERALD, J. Now that's smart!. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, v. 1, n. 4, p. 17-29, 2007.
WANG, L.; WANG, G. Big data in cyber-physical systems, digital manufacturing and industry 4.0. International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing (IJEM), v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-8, 2016.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All content on this work is licensed under a Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 Unported license. The articles are free to use, with their CC BY attributions of license.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s).
The publisher has the right to reject articles that in the evaluation process have been detected signs of plagiarism. The articles that have been detected indications of plagiarism after the publication, will be excluded from the edition. And the indication of the problem will be informed in the place of the text, keeping the same amount of pages.
This journal adopts the principles of ethical conduct of international quality Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), as well as the parameters of Integrity in the Scientific Activity indicated by SCOPUS and SCIELO.
